Cases 61 - 70 of 743
MAXWELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv15220
Plaintiff:
MONTE BERNARD MAXWELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TOLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv15342
Plaintiff:
THEODORE MAXWELL TOLER, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DESROSIER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14666
Plaintiff:
MAXWELL DESROSIER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Maxwell v. Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard & Nantucket Steamship Authority
as 1:2023cv11302
Plaintiff:
Keith Maxwell
Defendant:
Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard & Nantucket Steamship Authority
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Goodman v. Bouzy
as 23-874
Plaintiff:
Jason Goodman
Counter Claimant:
David George Sweigert
Defendant:
Christopher Ellis Bouzy, Bot Sentiel, Inc., George Webb Sweigert and others
Dulaney v. United States Postal Services
as 4:2023cv02101
Plaintiff:
Maxwell Ivan Dulaney
Defendant:
United States Postal Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Maxwell v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01846
Plaintiff:
Gregory Maxwell, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pass v. Maxwell et al
as 9:2023cv80854
Plaintiff:
LATONYA PASS
Defendant:
RUSSELL MAXWELL and LOGAN SEXTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Maxwell v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00696
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc, Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi-Aventis US Inc
Plaintiff:
Reponza Maxwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROCKWELL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10978
Plaintiff:
MAXWELL ADAM DAVID ROCKWELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
