Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Miracle v. McLaughin
as 5:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Melissa Miracle
Defendant:
Maxwell T. McLaughin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Ballard v. Cope et al
as 2:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Jason Ballard
Defendant:
Danny Cope, United Household Rentals, Inc. and Tina Maxwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sterett et al v. TBM Carriers, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00079
Plaintiff:
Katherine E. Sterett, William L. Sterett, IV, Maxwell Braden Sterett and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
TBM Carriers, Inc., Roberto Ignacio M. Enriquez and Jose Alberto T. Goxcon
3Rd Party Defendant:
John Doe Individuals 1-3, John Doe Companies 4-6, Sterett Companies, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 mv
Baker et al v. Texas Eastern Transmission, LP et al
as 5:2020cv00393
Plaintiff:
Conley Gooch, L. F., J. B. and others
Defendant:
Enbridge (U.S.), Inc., NDT Systems & Services LLC, Spectra Energy Corp. and others
Executor:
Angie Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Maxwell Brothers Lumber Company, LLC v. Veneer Services, LLC
as 4:2018cv00182
Plaintiff:
Maxwell Brothers Lumber Company, LLC
Defendant:
Veneer Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Philpot-Roach v. Simmons et al
as 4:2018cv00114
Defendant:
Brian Maxwell, Buck Seger, Jared Simmons and others
Plaintiff:
Roger W. Philpot-Roach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxwell v. Hardin County Jail et al
as 3:2018cv00419
Defendant:
Danny Allen, Hardin County Jail and R.S. Reynolds
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ray Maxwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxwell v. USA
as 2:2018cv00038
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Lazelle Maxwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
