Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Humphrey v. Murry et al
as 4:2010cv00132
Plaintiff:
Omar Khayyam Humphrey
Defendant:
Ruby Murry, Ann Armstrong, Correctional Investigation Department Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxwell v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 5:2010cv00161
Plaintiff:
Lloyd George Maxwell
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Immigration Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Maxwell v. United States et al
as 5:2010cv00151
Plaintiff:
Lloyd George Maxwell
Defendant:
United States and Bruce Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Maxwell v. Hininger et al
as 5:2010cv00130
Plaintiff:
Lloyd George Maxwell
Defendant:
Damon Hininger, Vance Laughlin, Unknown Slavens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Maxwell v. Bauhaus U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2010cv00122
Plaintiff:
Tyrone V. Maxwell
Defendant:
Bauhaus U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morris v. Collins et al
as 4:2010cv00022
Plaintiff:
Willie Morris
Defendant:
Marcus Collins, S. Caldwell, Henry Maxwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maxwell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 3:2010cv00029
Plaintiff:
Bethany Maxwell and Bethany Maxwell
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Mattie Alexander and John and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Reeves et al v. Graves et al
as 5:2009cv00208
Plaintiff:
Rebecca E. Reeves and James Reeves
Defendant:
K. Maxwell Graves, Jr., Walter F. Beesley and Graves and Beesley LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Shorty v. Scott et al
as 4:2009cv00121
Plaintiff:
Eddie James Shorty
Defendant:
Barbara Scott, Terry Callton, Lorenzo Townes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll v. Maxwell et al
as 4:2009cv00115
Plaintiff:
Wiley Zachary Carroll
Defendant:
Henry Maxwell, Lawrence Kelly and James Brewer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
