Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Mayes v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00358
Petitioner:
Keejuan Mayes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mayes v. Kenova Police Department et al
as 3:2021cv00499
Plaintiff:
Rodney Dale Mayes
Defendant:
Kenova Police Department and Wayne County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01360
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00535
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Barrett v. Diesel Power Transport Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04161
Plaintiff:
Olive Barrett
Defendant:
Diesel Power Transport, Inc. and William Robert Mayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cunningham et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv11219
Plaintiff:
Willie Maye Cunningham and Ronald E. Cunningham
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mayes v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv10727
Plaintiff:
Julia Mayes
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ransom et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2016cv02605
Plaintiff:
Linda Ransom and John Mayes
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mayes v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv11490
Plaintiff:
Carolyn J. Mayes
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
