Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Roman v. SPILMAN THOMAS & BATTLE, PLLC et al
as 7:2023cv00749
Plaintiff:
Patricia Denice Roman
Defendant:
SPILMAN THOMAS & BATTLE, PLLC, FARM CREDIT OF THE VIRGINIAS, ACA, FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Wright v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2023cv01232
Plaintiff:
Reginald Wright
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Child Support Enforcement, Maria Jolla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McDaniel v. Layman et al
as 7:2023cv00518
Plaintiff:
Joshua McDaniel
Defendant:
Sgt. Layman, Ofc. Jimenez and Ofc. Schnepper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Stokes et al
as 7:2023cv00361
Plaintiff:
Intell Jayshon Allen
Defendant:
Derek Stokes, Dr. McDaniels, Captain Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Proffitt v. Wellpath et al
as 7:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Richard M. Proffitt
Defendant:
WVRJ, Wellpath, Correct Care LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDaniel v. LTC Holdings, Inc.
as 7:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Rachele McDaniel and Siedha Haskell
Defendant:
LTC Holdings, Inc. doing business as Medical Facilities of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
McDaniel v. Campbell et al
as 7:2021cv00649
Petitioner:
Michael W. McDaniel
Defendant:
Mr. Campbell and Mr. Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniel v. Campbell et al
as 1:2021cv01374
Plaintiff:
Michael W. McDaniel
Defendant:
Mr. Campbell and Mr. Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00013
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
