Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SEPTEMBER et al v. CITY OF ELIZABETH et al
as 2:2023cv21415
Plaintiff:
MCDOWELL SEPTEMBER and ROBERT ROBINSON
Defendant:
CITY OF ELIZABETH, ELIZABETH POLICE DEPARTMENT, POLICE CHIEF GIACOMMO SACCA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCDOWELL v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 2:2023cv03635
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER E. MCDOWELL
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, THE OFFICE OF THE HOMELESS, APPLE TREE FAMILY CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FORISH v. BRASILE et al
as 2:2023cv01316
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STEVEN FORISH
Defendant:
JOHN BRASILE, CHUCK McDOWELL, JR., LATROBE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCDOWELL v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL.
as 2:2023cv01646
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER E. MCDOWELL
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, APPLE TREE FAMILY CENTRAL and LUTHERAN SETTLEMENT HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MCDOWELL v. ROBRENO
as 2:2022cv04404
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER E. MCDOWELL
Defendant:
JUDGE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jennifer McDowell v. Department of Human Services
as 22-2123
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JENNIFER E. MCDOWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
