Cases 1 - 10 of 91
McKenzie v. Robertson
as 2:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Dale McKenzie
Defendant:
Daniel Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
McKenzie v. United States of America (INMATE 4)
as 3:2023cv00723
Plaintiff:
Lewis McKenzie
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Russell v. McKenzie et al
as 2:2023cv01357
Plaintiff:
Lionel Russell
Defendant:
Brandon McKenzie and Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKenzie et al v. Warrior, City of et al
as 2:2023cv01308
Plaintiff:
Jennifer McKenzie, Julian McKenzie, Christopher McKenzie and others
Defendant:
Warrior, City of, Chief Ray Horn and Officer Lee Glenn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morgan v. Jenkins et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00404
Plaintiff:
Garon McKenzie Morgan
Defendant:
Clatys Jenkins, Larry McCovery and John Pryor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Gordy et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
Garon McKenzie Morgan
Defendant:
Christopher Gordy, Larry McCovery and Bryan Gavins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Carter et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Garon McKenzie Morgan
Defendant:
Karen Carter, Clatys Jenkins, Laveta Boben and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Holland (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
Garon McKenzie Morgan
Defendant:
Mrs. Holland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
