Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00591
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Mendez v. Bridgeport et al
as 3:2019cv00853
Defendant:
Nathalie Mclaughlin, Adam Szeps, Kenneth Fortes and others
Plaintiff:
Carmelo Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLaughlin v. Gus et al
as 3:2019cv00228
Plaintiff:
Raymond McLaughlin
Defendant:
Henry Kopel, Christopher Gus and Michael Dragon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McLaughlin v. USA
as 3:2019cv00051
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Raymond McLaughlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McLaughlin v. United States et al
as 3:2018cv02063
Defendant:
Deidre Daly, United States, Michael Oragon and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond McLaughlin
McLaughlin v. USA
as 3:2018cv01985
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Raymond McLaughlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McLaughlin v. USA
as 3:2018cv01888
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Raymond McLaughlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
North River Insurance Company v. O & G Industries, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00589
Counter Claimant:
Daniel Timmons, James Thompson, Debra Candelora and others
Plaintiff:
North River Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Ace American Insurance Company
Intervenor:
Melvin Baldwin
Defendant:
O & G Industries, Inc., Everest National Insurance Company and Keystone Construction and Maintenance Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
McLaughlin v. City Carting, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv01057
Defendant:
City Carting, Inc., City Carting & Recycling, Inc. and City Carting Holding Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John McLaughlin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McLaughlin v. City Carting, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv01064
Defendant:
City Carting & Recycling, Inc. , City Carting Holding Company, Inc. , City Carting, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John McLaughlin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
