Cases 1 - 10 of 239
MEADE v. LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv01704
Plaintiff:
DONALD C. MEADE
Defendant:
LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION, ELLEN COOPER, DENNIS GLASS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BARNETT v. HONORABLE JUDGE J. MEAD
as 1:2023cv00248
Plaintiff:
JOMO BARNETT
Defendant:
HONORABLE JUDGE J. MEAD, D.A. JEREMY LIGHTNER, DET. RUSSELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
AL-MURAIHEJ v. HIRZ et al
as 1:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
FUAD AL-MURAIHEJ
Defendant:
ERIE COUNTY D.A. ELIZABETH HIRZ, JUDGE JOHN MEAD, OFFICER DEFRANKO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
ARRINGTON v. MASON ET AL
as 1:2022cv00331
Petitioner:
JAMES K. ARRINGTON
Respondent:
BERNADETTE MASON, JUDGE JOHN J. MEAD, EMILY C. DOWNING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MEADE v. SALAMON et al
as 2:2022cv04278
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MEADE
Defendant:
MARY JO SALAMON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
PUMBA v. VOLPE et al
as 5:2022cv02929
Plaintiff:
OSVALDO PUMBA
Defendant:
AMANDA MEAD VOLPE, BROOKE ALBERTA GAGLIONE, TARALYNA GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
