Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Christian Dior Couture SA v. Lin
as 26-2080
Defendant:
XIAOLIU WANG, Li Li Wang, XINGYUN HU and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN DIOR COUTURE SA and LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER
Montoya v. The Board of Regents of the University of NM et al
as 1:2026cv01423
Plaintiff:
Rita C. Montoya
Defendant:
The University Of New Mexico, Heather Jaramillo, The Board of Regents of the University of NM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Christian Dior Couture SA v. Lin
as 26-1029
Defendant:
XIAOLIU WANG, XIAOLE LIN, XINGYUN HU and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN DIOR COUTURE SA, ABC and LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER
Christian Dior Couture SA v. Lin
as 26-976
Defendant:
XIAOLIU WANG, XINGYUN HU, DEF and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN DIOR COUTURE SA, LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER and ABC
August Image, LLC v. Mei Lee Fleming Optometry PC
as 4:2026cv02554
Plaintiff:
August Image, LLC
Defendant:
Mei Lee Fleming Optometry PC doing business as Luminance Vision Optometry
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv09921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00823
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Amrhein et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11892
Plaintiff:
Patricia Budd-Stewart, Antoinette Passero, Philippe Chieu and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv05670
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Archibald Cunningham et al v. Kevin Singer et al
as 2:2014cv09104
Defendant:
Lawrence J Appel, Lawrence J. Appel, Edward S Berberian and others
Plaintiff:
Archibald Cunningham and Humberto Ruiz
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
