Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Lee v. Centurion LLC et al
as 5:2024cv06048
Plaintiff:
Zachary D Lee
Defendant:
Centurion LLC, WRDCC Medical Staff, Nurse Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shoemaker et al v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00420
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Shoemaker, Andrea L. Arroyo, Benjamin Atwell and others
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc. and T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re: T-Mobile 2022 Customer Data Security Breach Litigation
as 4:2023md03073
Plaintiff:
Judith Lynch, Frankie J. Gonzalez, Lisa Frierson and others
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc. and T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Miller v. American United Taxi Affiliation Inc., et al
as 5:2021cv06132
Defendant:
Mrs. Mary M Miller, American United Taxi Affiliation Inc. and Abdella Jamal Mohammed
Plaintiff:
Mary Melton-Miller and Derek Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Melton v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Services et al
as 4:2021mc09001
Petitioner:
Yong Yol Melton
Respondent:
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services and David M. Douglas
Brooks v. Melton et al
as 4:2019cv00949
Defendant:
Michelle Bomber, Walter Manning, Melvin Manning and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerrod v. Phillips et al
as 4:2019cv03131
Defendant:
Gary Fenwick, Zachary Phillips, Nathan B. Roney and others
Plaintiff:
Herman M. Jerrod
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melton v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2019cv01835
Plaintiff:
Johnnie M. Melton
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Melton v. Precythe et al
as 2:2018cv04192
Plaintiff:
William L Melton
Defendant:
Corizon Health Inc., Anne L. Precythe and Ruanne Stamps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
