Cases 1 - 10 of 11
EVANS v. THE GENSIGHT GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2023cv05121
Plaintiff:
CHERYL EVANS
Defendant:
THE GENSIGHT GROUP INC. doing business as GENSIGHT and MICHAEL MENARD
Phoenix Contact USA, Inc. v. Menard Electronics, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
Phoenix Contact USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Menard Electronics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
MENARD v. ASTELLAS PHARMA US, INC.
as 2:2022cv03056
Plaintiff:
MARK MENARD
Defendant:
ASTELLAS PHARMA US, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
MENARD v. MANSI et al
as 2:2021cv02130
Plaintiff:
CHARLES GUY MENARD
Defendant:
PATRICIA CURRANT, CAROLINE CINQUANTO, CORIE FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01650
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
DGI-MENARD, INC. v. BAXMEYER CONSTRUCTION, INC.
as 2:2017cv01469
Plaintiff:
DGI-MENARD, INC.
Defendant:
BAXMEYER CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MENARDE v. TRI-STATE PROFESSIONAL et al
as 5:2016cv05560
Plaintiff:
JAMIE MENARDE
Defendant:
TRI-STATE PROFESSIONAL, RAFAEL A. MORALES, DANIEL DADINO and others
Cross_claimant:
MANISH GOEL and DANIEL DADINO
Cross_defendant:
D.L. PETERSON TRUST, DANIEL DADINO , RAFAEL A. MORALES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MENARD et al v. HEWLETT PACKARD COMPANY/COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv03570
Plaintiff:
WENDY MENARD and TIMOTHY MENARD
Defendant:
HEWLETT PACKARD COMPANY/COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION and WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MENARDE v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO.
as 2:2011cv03055
Plaintiff:
JOHN MENARDE
Defendant:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MENARD v. W.R. GRACE & CO.
as 2:2010cv83921
Plaintiff:
NEAL B. MENARD
Defendant:
W.R. GRACE & CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
