Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
DENNIS, JR. v. ALISSA PIERSON DENNIES ESTATE ET AL. et al
as 2:2024cv00964
Plaintiff: JAMES ALOYSIUS DENNIS, JR.
Defendant: ALISSA PIERSON DENNIES ESTATE ET AL., JAMAUSHIREE DENNIS ESTATE ST AL., MIAH RENEE DENNIS ESTATE ET AL. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians v. Merrick Garland et al
as 5:2024cv00379
Plaintiff: TWENTY-NINE PALMS BAND OF MISSION INDIANS, and Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians a Federally Recognized Indian Tribe doing business as Twenty-Nine Palms Distribution
Defendant: Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, Merrick Garland, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Lawrence v. Garland, et al
as 24-1039
Plaintiff: MICHAEL LAWRENCE
Defendant: MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States, STEVEN M. DETTELBACH, Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and PHIL WEISER, Attorney General of the State of Colorado
perkins et al v. garland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00766
Plaintiff: ronald oddelle perkins, Ronald Oddelle Perkins Estate et al., Kanika Glover Estate et al. and others
Defendant: merrick garland attorney general et al., United States Department of Justice HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as MERRICK GARLAND, simon green ceo of the us dept. of ed. et al., United States Department of Education HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as SIMON GREEN, andrew saul commissioner et al., Social Security Administration HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as ANDREW SAUL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00368
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Ifeji et al v. garland et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff: Jazzlyn Shabera Ifeji, Jazzlyn Shabera Ifeji Estate et al., Joseph Eddie Pryor Estate et al. and others
Defendant: merrick garland attorney general et al., United States Department of Justice HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as MERRICK GARLAND, andrew saul commissioner et al., Social Security Administration HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as ANDREW SAUL, janet louise yellen secretary of the treasury et al., United States Department of the Treasury HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as JANET LOUISE YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
motley v. JaNae Rocquel Motley Estate et al et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv10268
Plaintiff: janae rocquel motley
Defendant: JaNae Rocquel Motley Estate et al, Dymarion Rashad Brooks Estate et al, Derrion Rashad Brooks Estate et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
barclay et al v. dixon et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv10272
Plaintiff: leshawn maurice barclay
Defendant: webb, jeremiah darnell Estate et al, barclay, noah sencer robert Estate et al, lynch, malakai levi Estate et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kamentsa Inga Church-Soul of the Hummingbird, Inc. et al v. Garland, Attorney General of the United States et al
as 4:2023cv04173
Plaintiff: Kamentsa Inga Church-Soul of the Hummingbird, Inc., Hector-Aliro Ortiz Jimenez, Individually and as Spiritual Leader of the Church, Taraina Phillips, Member of the Church and others
Defendant: Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, Anne Milgram, Administrator of the U.S. DEA and Christopher Magnus, Commissioner of the U.S. CBP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Aposhian v. Garland, et al
as 23-4141
Plaintiff / Appellant: W. CLARK APOSHIAN
Defendant / Appellee: MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States of America, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, THOMAS E. BRANDON, Acting Director, Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?