Cases 1 - 8 of 8
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. METALWORKING LUBRICANTS COMPANY
as 1:2022cv01560
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF INDIANA
Defendant:
METALWORKING LUBRICANTS COMPANY
METALWORKING LUBRICANTS COMPANY v. ALLIED WORLD NATIONAL ASSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2021cv02417
Plaintiff:
METALWORKING LUBRICANTS COMPANY
Defendant:
ALLIED WORLD NATIONAL ASSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Somerset Energy Refining, LLC v. Metalworking Lubricants Company
as 6:2009cv00376
Plaintiff:
Somerset Energy Refining, LLC
Defendant:
Metalworking Lubricants Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgemen
Metalworking Lubricants Company v. Somerset Energy Refining, LLC
as 2:2009cv14376
Plaintiff:
Metalworking Lubricants Company and Metalworking Lubricants Company
Defendant:
Somerset Energy Refining, LLC
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
METALWORKING LUBRICANTS COMPANY v. SOMERSET ENERGY REFINING LLC
as 1:2009cv00520
Plaintiff:
METALWORKING LUBRICANTS COMPANY
Defendant:
SOMERSET ENERGY REFINING LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. v. METALWORKING LUBRICANTS COMPANY
as 2:2008cv01479
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
METALWORKING LUBRICANTS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
NUCOR STEEL v. METALWORKING LUBRICANTS COMPANY
as 1:2007cv00151
Plaintiff:
NUCOR STEEL, NUCOR STEEL and NUCOR STEEL
Defendant:
METALWORKING LUBRICANTS COMPANY, METALWORKING LUBRICANTS COMPANY, METALWORKING LUBRICANTS COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Exxon Mobil Corporation et al v. Metalworking Lubricants Company
as 2:2007cv10253
Plaintiff:
Exxon Mobil Corporation and ExxonMobil Oil Corporation
Defendant:
Metalworking Lubricants Company
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
