Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Rajkarnikar v. Bloomfield Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Nirjala Rajkarnikar
Defendant:
Bloomfield Police Department, Waterbury Hospital, Sama LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kirti Mehta v. Victoria Partners, et al
as 23-15244
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIRTI A. MEHTA
Defendant / Appellee:
VICTORIA PARTNERS, doing business as Park-Mgm Casino & Hotel Operator, ANN HOFF, LONDON SWINNEY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Mehta v. Victoria Partners et al
as 2:2021cv01493
Plaintiff:
Kirti A. Mehta
Defendant:
Victoria Partners doing business as Park-Mgm Casino & Hotel Operator, Ann Hoff, London Swinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02605
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv08798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MGM International Television Distribution Inc v. PT Comunicacoes S A
as 2:2012cv06893
Plaintiff:
MGM International Television Distribution Inc
Defendant:
PT Comunicacoes S A
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-17358
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
MGM International Television Distribution Inc. v. Orbit Communications Co., Ltd.
as 2:2008cv05841
Plaintiff:
MGM International Television Distribution Inc.
Defendant:
Orbit Communications Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
