Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Doe v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv05578
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Commissioner Tyrone Oliver, Randy Sauls and others
Amicus Curiae:
United States, Network for Victim Recovery of DC (NVRDC) and ACLU of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cassady v. Ward et al
as 1:2022cv05060
Plaintiff:
Dana Marie Cassady and David Dwayne Cassady
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Sharon Lewis, Dr. Cleary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Bess, et al
as 1:2019cv05410
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, Georgia Department of Corrections, Centene Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Renee Johnson
Harrell v. Brickhouse et al
as 1:2018cv01183
Plaintiff:
Chyvonne E. Harrell
Defendant:
William Brickhouse, Ph.D., MHM Correctional Services, Inc., Nekeya Dumas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrell v. Mann et al
as 1:2017cv02499
Plaintiff:
Chyvonne E. Harrell
Defendant:
Jeffrey Mann, William Brickhouse , Correct Care Solutions, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cook-Benjamin v. MHM Correctional Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv04086
Plaintiff:
Mamie Cook-Benjamin
Defendant:
MHM Correctional Services, Inc. and William Brickhouse
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Drew v. Moore et al
as 1:2010cv01461
Plaintiff:
David Carl Drew
Defendant:
S.L. Speakman , Alexander Moore , David Dieder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
