Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Howell v. Emerge et al
as 1:2019cv11043
Defendant:
MPCH, Aubrey Graham, Common Purpose and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Howell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv11968
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Bloom v. Massachusetts Partnership for Correctional Healthcare, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv40170
Plaintiff:
Carrie Bloom
Defendant:
Massachusetts Partnership for Correctional Healthcare, LLC and MHM Health Professionals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Malloy v. Massachusetts Department of Correction et al
as 1:2015cv13427
Plaintiff:
Robert Malloy
Defendant:
Massachusetts Department of Correction, Tiana Bennett, Forensic Health Sevices and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reaves v. Department of Correction et al
as 4:2015cv40100
Plaintiff:
Timothy M Reaves
Defendant:
Department of Correction, Carol Higgins O'Brien, Michael Rodrigues and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuller v. O'BRIEN et al
as 1:2014cv14168
Plaintiff:
Charlene-Paige Fuller
Defendant:
CAROL HIGGINS O'BRIEN , Christine M. Verdini , Raymond W. Marchilli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pappargeris v. MHM Correctional Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv13049
Plaintiff:
A. George Pappargeris
Defendant:
MHM Correctional Services, Inc. , Kate Irwin , Jean Bradanick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv12354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Barry v. MHM Correctional Service Inc et al
as 1:2013cv11912
Plaintiff:
Brian Barry
Defendant:
MHM Correctional Services, Inc., UMASS Correctional Health Services, Angelees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelsey v. Norfolk State Prison et al
as 1:2012cv10029
Plaintiff:
Michael Kelsey
Defendant:
Norfolk State Prison, Gary Roden, Cynthia Sumner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
