Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Outley v. Penzone et al
as 2:2018cv02753
Defendant:
Unknown Graffious, Unknown Haley, Unknown Tennyson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Outley, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. HOUSE et al
as 2:2018cv01130
Defendant:
BYUNGHAK JIN, T. POZIVIAK, M. OPPMAN and others
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hill v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2018cv02613
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Unknown Veshi, Elisa Ramunno and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Dwayne Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Penzone et al
as 2:2018cv01129
Plaintiff:
Josef Timothy Dixon
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Unknown Miceli, Unknown Kindell-House and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Penzone et al
as 2:2018cv01084
Plaintiff:
John Leo Davis
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Unknown Young, Unknown Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopkins v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2018cv01052
Plaintiff:
Albert Hopkins
Defendant:
Unknown Party, Unknown Kindell-House, Unknown Kirk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keller v. Gruninger et al
as 3:2018cv50106
Plaintiff:
Chayse Keller
Defendant:
Gruninger, Savaiano, Miceli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonathan McAllister, Sr. v. Paul Penzone, et al
as 17-17469
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN MCALLISTER, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL PENZONE, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, UNKNOWN ALVEREZ, Dr., Director of Arizona County Correctional Health Services, UNKNOWN GRIMM, Lt., Acting Jail Commander and others
Davis v. Penzone et al
as 2:2017cv03166
Plaintiff:
John Leo Davis
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Joseph M Arpaio, S Vail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McAllister v. Penzone et al
as 2:2017cv02884
Plaintiff:
Jonathan McAllister, Sr.
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Unknown Alverez, Unknown Grimm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
