Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jones v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2023pq00634
Plaintiff:
Michael A Jones
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Syngenta AG
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jones v. Cannataro et al
as 2:2023cv02027
Plaintiff:
Michael A Jones, II
Defendant:
Nicholas Cannataro, Shannon Haggard, Jeffery Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Downey et al
as 2:2022cv02104
Plaintiff:
Michael A Jones, II
Defendant:
. Downey, . Nick and . Shannon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Golbert v. Aurora Chicago Lakeshore Hospital LLC et al
as 1:2019cv08257
Defendant:
Richard Kasyoki, Beverly J. Walker, Beverly Mims and others
Plaintiff:
Charles P. Golbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Golbert et al v. Walker et al
as 1:2018cv08176
Defendant:
Jane Gantner, Sari Rowitz, Theresa Matthews and others
Plaintiff:
Sterling B., Tyrese B., Issac D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv10272
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Jones
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Berg v. Jones et al
as 2:2014cv02199
Plaintiff:
David L Berg
Defendant:
Michael Q Jones, Joel Fletcher , Champaign County Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris v. Wal Mart et al
as 3:2013cv00499
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Harris
Defendant:
Wal Mart, Michael Q Jones, Scott M Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones et al v. Culver Franchising System, Inc.
as 1:2013cv03269
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Jones , MBAJ Group, LLC , Michael Anthony G. Wilbern and others
Defendant:
Culver Franchising System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jones v. Cross
as 3:2012cv01228
Petitioner:
Michael Everett Jones
Respondent:
James Cross, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
