Cases 1 - 10 of 12
McCall v. USA
as 3:2022cv01656
Petitioner:
Michael David McCall
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
USA v. Michael McCall
as 20-10959
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael David McCall
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
USA v. Michael McCall
as 19-10030
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL DAVID MCCALL
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Philip Turney, et al v. Henry Atencio, et al
as 18-80041
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
PHILIP A. TURNEY, BILLY RAY BARTLETT, JAMES S. HENDRICKSON and others
Defendant - Respondent:
HENRY ATENCIO, Director, Idaho Department of Correction, in his official capacity, RONA SIEGERT, RN, CCHP-RN, iin her individual and her official capacities for actions under color of law as Health Services Director, IDOC, JOHN MIGLIORI, Dr. MD, in his individual and his official capacities for actions under color of law as treating physician at SICI and others
McCall v. Atencio et al
as 1:2018cv00099
Plaintiff:
Michael A McCall
Defendant:
Henry Atencio, Rona Siegert, John Migliori and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turney et al v. Atencio et al
as 1:2018cv00001
Plaintiff:
Philip A Turney, Billy Ray Bartlett, James S Hendrickson and others
Defendant:
Henry Atencio, Rona Siegert, John Migliori and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Eberth et al
as 6:2014cv06138
Petitioner:
Jonathan Richardson
Respondent:
Timothy W. Eberth, John G. Barbera, Michael A. McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hood v. Byars et al
as 1:2013cv01098
Plaintiff:
Monterio Lamarcus Hood
Defendant:
William R Byars, Jr, Robert E Ward, Dennis R Patterson, Sr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
McCall v. Wengler
as 1:2012cv00439
Petitioner:
Michael Alan McCall
Respondent:
Timothy Wengler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
