Cases 1 - 10 of 16
WISOR v. REESE et al
as 2:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
II MICHAEL ALLEN WISOR
Defendant:
GREGORY T. REESE, JESSICA C. SCHWARTZ and ALTOONA PAROLE OFFICE UNIT 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WISOR v. REESE et al
as 3:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALLEN WISOR, II
Defendant:
GREGORY T. REESE, JESSICA C. SCHWARTZ and ALTOONA PAROLE OFFICE UNIT 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. QUINN et al
as 2:2020cv02021
Defendant:
OFFICE OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF FAYETTE COUNTY PA and MICHAEL QUINN
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALLEN BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TRUMP v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL STAFF et al
as 2:2020cv00312
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL STAFF, MCCF SECURITTY OFFICERS, PRIME CARE MEDICAL DOCTORS AND NURSES and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALLEN TRUMP, SR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01969
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BILINSKI v. WILLS EYE HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2016cv02728
Plaintiff:
RONALD JOSEPH BILINSKI
Defendant:
WILLS EYE HOSPITAL, WILLS EYE INSTITUTE, WILLS EYE OPHTHALMOLOGY CLINIC INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Sinko v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv01781
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Sinko
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WONDERLING v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OFPROBATION & PAROLE
as 2:2014cv00023
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ALLEN WONDERLING
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OFPROBATION & PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WIGGINS v. THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2013cv03862
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALLEN WIGGINS
Defendant:
THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Quiggle v. Coleman et al
as 1:2011cv01107
Petitioner:
Michael Allen Quiggle
Respondent:
Coleman and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
