Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Toon v. Spann et al
as 5:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Steven Glen Toon
Defendant:
Officer Michael Andrew Spann, Officer Jonathan Sholar and The City of Hopkinsville, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Wilson v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00897
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Wilson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kitchen v. McDonald et al
as 2:2023cv13075
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Kitchen
Defendant:
Karen D. McDonald, Marilyn Day, Rae Ann Ruddy and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Michael Kitchen v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 22-2160
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL ANDREW KITCHEN
Defendant / Appellant:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, GRETCHEN WHITMER, Governor and BRIAN SHIPMAN
Defendant:
MICHAEL C. EAGEN
Michael Kitchen v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 22-1773
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL ANDREW KITCHEN
Defendant / Appellant:
GRETCHEN WHITMER, Governor, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON and BRIAN SHIPMAN
Defendant:
MICHAEL C. EAGEN
Michael Kitchen v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 22-1732
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL ANDREW KITCHEN
Defendant / Appellant:
GRETCHEN WHITMER, Governor, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON and BRIAN SHIPMAN
Defendant:
MICHAEL C. EAGEN
Michael Wood v. Jay Forshey
as 21-3525
Respondent / Appellee:
JAY FORSHEY
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL ANDREW WOOD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv10419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
