Cases 11 - 20 of 51
QUILL v. STRONG et al
as 4:2022cv00063
Petitioner:
SOPHIA J QUILL
Respondent:
STRONG, FED BOP, FCI TALLAHASSEE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Watlington v. Carvajal
as 1:2022cv00087
Petitioner:
Daniel Watlington
Respondent:
Michael Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
White v. Carvajal et al
as 1:2021cv05310
Plaintiff:
Saundra L. White
Defendant:
Michael Carvajal, Nichol Chilsom, Stephen Ricks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv23828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Teryaeva-Reed v. Garrett et al
as 7:2021cv01279
Petitioner:
Julia Teryaeva-Reed
Respondent:
Chad Garrett, JA Keller, Michael Carvajal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bey v. Salinas et al
as 1:2021cv03260
Petitioner:
Joell Mustafa Bey and Joell Tremayne Howard
Respondent:
Catherine M. Salinas, James N. Hatten, Michael S. Yeager and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Crutchfield v. Fleiner et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00515
Plaintiff:
Barney Crutchfield
Defendant:
Stacey Fleiner, D. Taylor, Kalvin Calhoun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FIORITO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv03152
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. FIORITO
Defendant:
United States of America, Michael Carvajal, IAN CONNOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Touizer v. Jenkins et al
as 1:2021cv22813
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Touizer
Defendant:
Warden Sylvester L. Jenkins, Merrick Garland and Michael Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
