Cases 1 - 10 of 19
SOURESRAFIL v. CARVAJAL et al
as 2:2022cv00210
Plaintiff:
OMID SOURESRAFIL
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, KALIS, T. RULE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
BARRY v. INCH et al
as 2:2022cv00198
Plaintiff:
BRANDIE LEE BARRY and RANDY CLAYTON BARRY
Defendant:
MARK S INCH, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRAVATA v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2022cv00137
Petitioner:
JOHN BRAVATA
Respondent:
S. KALLIS, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, T. RULE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
SOURESVAFIL v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2022cv00143
Petitioner:
OMID SOURESVAFIL and OMID SOURESRAFIL
Respondent:
S. KALLIS, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, A. MATEVOURIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
JOHNSON v. WARDEN FCI TERRA HAUTE
as 2:2021cv00367
Petitioner:
LUSTA JOHNSON, SR
Respondent:
B. LAMMER and MICHAEL CARVAJAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BOOKER v. LAMMER et al
as 2:2021cv00351
Petitioner:
TERRENCE BOOKER
Respondent:
B. LAMMER and MICHAEL CARVAJAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ENDRE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv00349
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY A. ENDRE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, MICHAEL CARVAJAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
RICHARD v. LAMMER et al
as 2:2021cv00382
Petitioner:
THEODORE RICHARD
Respondent:
B. LAMMER and MICHAEL CARVAJAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RUWALA v. LAMMER et al
as 2:2021cv00365
Petitioner:
BILAL RUWALA
Respondent:
BRIAN LAMMER and MICHAEL CARVAJAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MONTGOMERY v. WARDEN OF USP TERRE HAUTE, IN et al
as 2:2021cv00020
Respondent:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, JEFFREY ROSEN and WARDEN OF USP TERRE HAUTE, IN
Petitioner:
LISA MARIE MONTGOMERY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
