Cases 21 - 30 of 32
KIS et al v. SMITH et al
as 2:2014cv01063
Plaintiff:
ZELJKO KIS and HELEN KIS
Defendant:
CATHERINE LORRAINE SMITH and MICHAEL EDWARD SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCRIBE v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv00763
Petitioner:
MICHAEL EDWARD SCRIBE
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and GERALD ROZUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rupp et al v. Resurent Capital Services, LP
as 1:2011cv02051
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Rupp and Jody Susan Rupp
Defendant:
Resurent Capital Services, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MIXON v. J.P. MASCARO & SONS et al
as 5:2011cv03675
Plaintiff:
THEOPHILIUS C. MIXON, III
Defendant:
J.P. MASCARO & SONS, WILLIAM H. PLATT, JAMES T. ANTHONY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SHARPE v. SHARTLE
as 1:2011cv02355
Petitioner:
MICHAEL EDWARD SHARPE
Respondent:
J.T. SHARTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WISE et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv61454
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL EDWARD WISE and PAULA WISE
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION , PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHARPE v. MEDINA et al
as 1:2010cv04276
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL EDWARD SHARPE
Defendant:
EDIBERTO MEDINA, DIANE HESS, MARYLIN ANGUD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv01827
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL EDWARDS
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SEXTON v. S.C.I. FRACKVILLE et al
as 2:2008cv01401
Petitioner:
MICHAEL EDWARD SEXTON
Respondent:
S.C.I. FRACKVILLE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF YORK and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
COLLINS et al v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv76840
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL EDWARDS COLLINS and GALE F. COLLINS
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC., BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
