Cases 11 - 20 of 23
MILLER et al v. ANDERSON et al
as 1:2017cv00276
Plaintiff:
DARREN MILLER and DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant:
MARYBETH ANDERSON, MAX GOTTESMAN, MICHAEL CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. CLARK et al
as 1:2017cv00204
Plaintiff:
SHAWN L. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MICHAEL R. CLARK, NANCY A. GIROUX, MELINDA L. ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03429
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL EDWARDS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Davern v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv00162
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Davern
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
KIS et al v. SMITH et al
as 2:2014cv01063
Plaintiff:
ZELJKO KIS and HELEN KIS
Defendant:
CATHERINE LORRAINE SMITH and MICHAEL EDWARD SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCRIBE v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv00763
Petitioner:
MICHAEL EDWARD SCRIBE
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and GERALD ROZUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rupp et al v. Resurent Capital Services, LP
as 1:2011cv02051
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Rupp and Jody Susan Rupp
Defendant:
Resurent Capital Services, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MIXON v. J.P. MASCARO & SONS et al
as 5:2011cv03675
Plaintiff:
THEOPHILIUS C. MIXON, III
Defendant:
J.P. MASCARO & SONS, WILLIAM H. PLATT, JAMES T. ANTHONY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
WISE et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv61454
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL EDWARD WISE and PAULA WISE
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION , PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EDWARDS v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv01827
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL EDWARDS
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
