Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Furr v. Chief of Selma Police Department et al
as 5:2022ct03455
Plaintiff:
Julian Terell Furr
Defendant:
Chief of Selma Police Department, Thomas Lock, Director of NCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Rippy-Bey et al v. North Carolina, State of et al
as 5:2013cv00040
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Rippy-Bey and The Noble Moors of the "Bey and "El" Tribes
Defendant:
North Carolina, State of, Roy Cooper, Michael F. Easley and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCORMICK V. SIPE ET AL
as 1:2011cv00416
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW E. MCCORMICK
Defendant:
JOSEPH M. SIPE, PATROLMAN STRICKLAND, CARTER CLENDENIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCormick v. Sipe et al
as 5:2011ct03014
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. McCormick
Defendant:
Joseph M. Sipe, Patrolman Strickland, Carter Clendenin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sherron v. Easley et al
as 5:2010ct03057
Plaintiff:
Robbie Sherron
Defendant:
Michael F. Easley, Theodis Beck, Beverly Eaves Perdue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Little v. Easley et al
as 5:2009ct03069
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Rydell Little
Defendant:
Michael F. Easley, Roy Cooper, Theodis Beck and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Martinez v. Easley
as 5:2009hc02008
Petitioner:
Francisco Martinez
Respondent:
Michael F. Easley
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carrington v. Easley et al
as 5:2008ct03175
Plaintiff:
Robert Timothy Carrington
Defendant:
Michael F. Easley, Boyd Bennett and Theodis Beck
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Littrell et al v. Beck et al
as 5:2008ct03121
Plaintiff:
Jackie DeWayne Littrell, Robbie Sherron and Keith Douglas Moran
Defendant:
Theodis Beck, Phillip Griffin, Donald H. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
