Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Papapietro v. Clott et al
as 3:2022cv00948
Plaintiff:
Anthony Papapietro
Defendant:
Michael Howard Clott, Bjorn Koritz, John Murray and others
Petitioner:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
HOWARD v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv00762
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HOWARD
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER STILL, PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER SPEISER, PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER SIMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
PALUCH v. LEWIS et al
as 2:2021cv01564
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. PALUCH, JR.
Defendant:
FRANK LEWIS, MATTHEW KENDERSKI, MICHAEL HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HOWARD et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv05944
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HOWARD and JULIETTE HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWARD v. GARMAN et al
as 2:2018cv00382
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HOWARD
Respondent:
GARMAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF _________
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HOWARD v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2013cv07204
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HOWARD
Respondent:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOWARD v. DELANEY et al
as 2:2011cv01870
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HOWARD
Defendant:
JOHN DELANEY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and CURRAN FROM-HOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOWARD v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2009cv05823
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HOWARD
Defendant:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, MYRON STANISHEFSKI, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FELLS v. BEARD et al
as 2:2009cv01473
Plaintiff:
WELDON WALTER FELLS
Defendant:
JEFFREY BEARD, BRIAN COLEMAN, RICKY MCCLAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
