Cases 1 - 10 of 14
CCAR Investments, Inc. v. Barra et al
as 1:2020cv00957
Defendant:
Richard C. Gozon, Jane E. Henney, Steven H. Collis and others
Nominal Defendant:
AmerisourceBergen Corp.
Plaintiff:
CCAR Investments, Inc.
Intervenor:
Teamsters Local 443 Health Services & Insurance Plan and Lebanon County Employees' Retirement Fund
Akpeneye v. US
as 20-1622
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM A. CUMMINGS, CHARLES DELUGO, KEVIN TINDAL, SR. and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN ALLEN and SALI ALPHAEK, et al.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Rosner v. Collis et al
as 1:2020cv00177
Defendant:
Kathleen Hyle, Richard Gozon, Jane E. Henney and others
Nominal Defendant:
Amerisourcebergen Corporation
Plaintiff:
Andrea Rosner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Longs v. Bradley L. Johnson, et al
as 19-2188
Petitioner / Appellant:
Michael J. Longs
Respondent / Appellee:
Bradley L. Johnson, Lancaster County ADF Director
Respondent:
Kristen, His Bailiff, Hon. McManaman and Hon. Jacobsens
Longs v. Lincoln Police Officer Groves et al
as 4:2019cv03001
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Longs, II
Defendant:
Laura Lowe and Lincoln Police Officer Groves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Longs v. Wherry et al
as 4:2018cv03153
Defendant:
Amy Goodro, Lincoln Police Department and Steven D. Wherry
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Longs, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Longs v. Nelson et al
as 4:2018cv03152
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Longs, II
Defendant:
"Chris", Hon Jodi Nelson, Troy L. Hawk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Longs v. Johnson
as 4:2018cv03148
Defendant:
Bradley Johnson
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Longs, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Longs v. Hawk
as 4:2018cv03146
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Longs, II
Defendant:
Troy L. Hawk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Bonilla v. Long
as 2:2018cv02162
Defendant:
Michael J. Long
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
