Cases 1 - 10 of 81
United States of America v. New-Tech Packaging et al
as 2:2024cv02249
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael Johnson
Garnishee:
New-Tech Packaging
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Johnson et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01636
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson and Jennifer Johnson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Charles Feiler, Jr. v. Michael Johnson, et al
as 23-1809
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES EDGAR FEILER, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DETROIT POLICE INVESTIGATING OFFICER MICHAEL JOHNSON, WAYNE COUNTY PROSECUTOR RAGAN LAKE, WAYNE COUNTY PRSECUTOR ELIZABETH ANN TAYLOR DORNIK and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv11810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Feiler, Jr. v. Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv11225
Plaintiff:
Charles Edgar Feiler, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael Johnson, Ragan Lake, Elizabeth Ann Taylor Dornik and others
United States of America v. Johnson
as 2:2023mc50204
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Michael Johnson
USA v. Michael Johnson
as 22-1331
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHNSON
Erie Adams v. USA
as 21-1662
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERIE ADAMS, aka Michael Johnson
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hamilton et al v. 3M Company et al
as 7:2021cv00087
Defendant:
3M Company, Network Supply, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hamilton, Angie Hamilton, Ricky Rowe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Christopher Johnson v. Gibson, et al
as 21-5413
Defendant / Appellee:
NEIL TROOST, M.D., Individually and in their Official Capacities and CHIEF DEPUTY LESLIE GIBSON, Individually and in their Official Capacities
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL JOHNSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
