Cases 71 - 80 of 139
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv13343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Johnson v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2014cv06148
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
The City Of New York, C.O.s "John Doe" #1-10, Yvette Caraballo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nix v. The City of Rochester, et al
as 6:2014cv06395
Plaintiff:
Corry G. Nix
Defendant:
The City Of Rochester, Rochester City Police Department, Michael Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. City of Dayton, Ohio et al
as 3:2014cv00198
Plaintiff:
Katherine Mitchell
Defendant:
City of Dayton, Ohio , John Syx , Michael Johnson and others
Counter_claimant:
City of Dayton, Ohio
Counter_defendant:
Katherine Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WBY, Inc. et al v. DeKalb County, Georgia et al
as 1:2014cv00253
Plaintiff:
WBY, Inc. , Joshua Schindler and Steve Youngelson
Defendant:
DeKalb County, Georgia, Cedric Alexander, Michael Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Human Relations Commission et al
as 3:2014cv00047
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
Human Relations Commission, Carolyn Miller Cooper and Martha Lawfer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv14450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-16993
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Christopher Weiland v. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Of, et al
as 13-14396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER J WEILAND
Defendant - Appellee:
PALM BEACH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, CHRISTOPHER FLEMING, individually and MICHAEL JOHNSON, individually
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
