Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Koppers Inc. v. R. Michael Johnson
as 1:2020cv02339
Defendant:
R. Michael Johnson
Plaintiff:
Koppers Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv05212
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Lee et al
as 9:2019cv01075
Defendant:
Moore, William Lee, H. Eigo and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04232
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
DiGiovanni et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia et al
as 1:2018cv12376
Plaintiff:
Louis DiGiovanni, Rosa M Ferrer, Denise Guidice and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Saudi High Commission for Relief of Bosnia & Herzegovina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 tt
Johnson v. Mannix et al
as 1:2018cv02842
Defendant:
James McCarthy, John and Jane Does, Paul Mannix and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Johnson v. Tudisco et al
as 1:2017cv08621
Plaintiff:
Carl Michael Johnson
Defendant:
Joseph Tudisco, Matthew Dicembri, Anthony Vicaretti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Reed et al
as 1:2017cv08620
Plaintiff:
Carl Michael Johnson
Defendant:
Kyle Reed, Thorton, Faith Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2017cv05376
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Johnson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv05296
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
City of New York , Flagumy Valcourt, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
