Cases
Feeder v. The State of Nevada et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00941
Plaintiff: Steven Aaron Feeder
Defendant: The State of Nevada, Aaron D. Ford and Michael Kovac
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barro v. Hollywood Jewelry and Pawn, Inc. et al
as 0:2019cv61533
Plaintiff: Alexander Barro
Defendant: Michael Kovacs and Hollywood Jewelry and Pawn, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PORCARO v. MACY' S SHOPPING CENTER et al
as 3:2015cv01910
Plaintiff: CHRISTIAN PORCARO
Defendant: MACY' S SHOPPING CENTER, BRIDGEWATER POLICE DEPT, BRIAN FRANZYSHEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kovacs et al v. ServiceLink LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00064
Plaintiff: Michael Kovacs and Sarah Kovacs
Defendant: ServiceLink LLC and John Does (1-15) ServiceLink Scheduling Firms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Yazzie et al v. Board of County Commissioners of San Juan County et al
as 1:2012cv00479
Plaintiff: Emerson Yazzie and Helen Yazzie
Defendant: Board of County Commissioners of San Juan County, City of Bloomfield, Correctional Healthcare Companies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KOVAC v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
as 2:2011cv63319
Plaintiff: MICHAEL KOVAC
Defendant: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KOVAC et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv63163
Plaintiff: MICHAEL KOVAC
Intervenor_plaintiff: STRATFORD PIPING CO.
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kovacic v. Clark Retail Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv01921
Defendant: Clark Retail Enterprises, Inc., Clark Retail Enterprises, Inc., Clark Retail Enterprises, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Michael Kovacic and Michael Kovacic
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?