Cases 1 - 10 of 82
SHAW v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Shaw
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
SHAW v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00250
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Shaw
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
MYERS v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2022cv02720
Petitioner:
MICHAEL MYERS and MICHAEL LEE MYERS
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Lee v. Golf Transportation, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01948
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee
Defendant:
Golf Transportation, Inc., O'Connor Trucking, Inc., JP Logistics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v. Golf Transportation, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03990
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee and Raven E Lee
Defendant:
Golf Transportation, Inc., O'Connor Trucking, Inc., OCONNOR TRUCKING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RIECO v. MCCREARY et al
as 2:2019cv01136
Defendant:
RUSSELL WOODS, HAYNES, MCCREARY and others
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Gordon v. Buebendorf et al
as 3:2019cv00626
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Gordon
Defendant:
SIS Buebendorf, Gemberling, Edinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TUSTIN v. STRAWN et al
as 2:2019cv00006
Defendant:
C.O. FREIDL, MIS G. MCGAVITT, DEPUTY WARDEN WAUGH and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEE TUSTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Gordon v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2018cv02420
Petitioner:
Michael Lee Gordon
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
