Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Michael Flynn, et al v. Jacqueline Love, et al
as 23-15540
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL J. FLYNN and PHILIP H. STILLMAN
Intervenor Plaintiff: REBECCA FLYNN-WILLIAMS, Successor Trustee of Laima Flynn Trust
Defendant / Appellee: JACQUELINE LOVE, MICHAEL E. LOVE, an individual and as Trustee of the Michael Love Family Trust and MELENCO, INC., a Nevada corporation
Abernathy et al v. Doordash, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv07545
Respondent: Doordash, Inc.
Petitioner: Malik Abdulhaqq, Terrell Abernathy, Parisa Aalami and others
3Rd Party Defendant: International Institute for Conflict Prevention and Resolution, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
Love v. Naphcare Medical Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00320
Defendant: Spokane County Detention Center, Naphcare Medical Department and State
Plaintiff: Christopher Michael Love
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen et al v. McKesson Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv03063
Plaintiff: Donna Allen , Eric Baker , Mary Battle and others
Defendant: McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Love v. Neverkewitz et al
as 2:2010cv01290
Plaintiff: Michael Love
Defendant: Walter J Neverkewitz, Julie Neverkewitz and Northwest Technical Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Rogozienski v. Allen et al
as 3:2008cv00316
Plaintiff: Frank E Rogozienski
Defendant: James D Allen, S Michael Love and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Rogozienski v. Allen et al
as 3:2007cv00742
Plaintiff: Frank E Rogozienski
Defendant: James D Allen, S Michael Love and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?