Cases 1 - 10 of 101
Scott v. Miller
as 4:2024cv00125
Petitioner:
Shannon Latarion Scott
Respondent:
Michael Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCoy v. Sipes et al
as 6:2023cv00404
Plaintiff:
Jimmie McCoy, III
Defendant:
B Sipes, Lt. Lysinger, C.O. Musile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowman v. Christian et al
as 6:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Gage Bowman
Defendant:
Johnnie Christian, Cody Liverman, Phillips Dilan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kellogg, et al v. Watts Guerra, et al
as 20-3172
Defendant / Appellee:
MAURO, ARCHER & ASSOCIATES, LLC, HOVLAND AND RASMUS, PLLC, JOHN DOES, 1-250 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BROMLEY RANCH, LLC, CHARLES BLAKE STRINGER, GARTH KRUGER and others
In re: Kellogg, et al
as 20-3084
Respondent:
JOHNSON LAW GROUP, WATTS GUERRA LLP, CROSS LAW FIRM, LLC and others
Petitioner:
DEAN HOLTORF, CHARLES BLAKE STRINGER, ROLAND B. BROMLEY and others
In re: Kellogg, et al
as 20-3051
Respondent:
JOHNSON LAW GROUP, WATTS GUERRA LLP, CROSS LAW FIRM, LLC and others
Petitioner:
DEAN HOLTORF, CHARLES BLAKE STRINGER, ROLAND B. BROMLEY and others
Kellogg, et al v. Watts Guerra, LLP, et al
as 20-3006
Defendant / Appellee:
HOVLAND AND RASMUS, PLLC, JOHN DOES, 1-250, PATTON HOVERSTEN & BERG, PA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BROMLEY RANCH, LLC, CHARLES BLAKE STRINGER, GARTH KRUGER and others
DeAtley, et al v. Corrections Corporation, et al
as 19-1372
Defendant / Appellee:
SARA ORTIZ, Investigator, MICHAEL MILLER, DAVID ZUPAN and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS J. AURELIO
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALAN DEATLEY
Aurelio, et al v. Corrections Corporation, et al
as 19-1362
Defendant / Appellee:
SARA ORTIZ, Investigator, MICHAEL MILLER, DAVID ZUPAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS J. AURELIO
Plaintiff:
ALAN DEATLEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
