Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Miller v. County of Lancaster et al
as 1:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Michael Miller
Defendant:
County of Lancaster and Office of Open Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MALARIK et al v. BEAVER COUNTY JAIL ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2021cv00779
Plaintiff:
DAVID LYONS, SR., ERNEST POOH THORTON, JAMES M. WHITEY BULGE MALARICK and others
Defendant:
BEAVER COUNTY DETECTIVE BUREAU GOON SQUAD, BEAVER COUNTY JAIL ADMINISTRATION, BEAVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WILLIS v. MONTANI et al
as 2:2021cv00221
Defendant:
MICHAEL MILLER, GREENER, JOHN DOE POLICE OFFICER ONE and others
Plaintiff:
EMMITT WILLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNIDER v. ALVAREZ et al
as 3:2020cv00241
Respondent:
Officer Heckert, C/O KILLEEN, Captain Eichenberg and others
Defendant:
ROBIN ALVAREZ and STEVENS
Plaintiff:
JOEL SNIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05934
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Miller v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv02129
Respondent:
John Wetzel, Josh Shapiro and PA State Attorney General
Petitioner:
Michael Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MILLER v. GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY
as 2:2020cv00625
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MILLER
Defendant:
GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
