Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Cherney et al v. FCA US, LLC
as 1:2026cv01081
Plaintiff:
Dennis Cherney, Janice Feagins, Brian Fernalld and others
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
MORGAN v. GREENWALD et al
as 3:2026cv04948
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAEL MORGAN
Defendant:
JOHN GREENWALD, JOHN BERGOSH, STEVE NASH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. USA
as 5:2026cv00156
Petitioner:
Dorian Michael Morgan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Morgan v. USA
as 5:2026cv00155
Petitioner:
Dorian Michael Morgan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MORGAN et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2026cv08251
Plaintiff:
PAMELA J. MORGAN and MICHAEL MORGAN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. (NEW JJCI), JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Unknown:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Morgan v. Gowramma et al
as 1:2026cv04196
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Morgan
Defendant:
Doctor Gowramma Shivashanker, Orange County and Unified Court System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv01001
Plaintiff:
Marc Michael Morgan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Morgan v. USA
as 5:2026cv00035
Petitioner:
Dorian Michael Morgan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
PHH Mortgage Corporation v. Morgan a/k/a Michael Morgan et al
as 1:2026cv00294
Plaintiff:
PHH Mortgage Corporation
Defendant:
Michael S. Morgan a/k/a Michael Morgan and John Doe #1 through John Doe #12
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
