Cases 31 - 40 of 512
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00249
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00851
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
26 California Bazar, Inc. et al v. Michael Mukasey et al
as 2:2009cv00871
Plaintiff:
26 California Bazar, Inc. and Isabelita E Ramilo
Defendant:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Jonathan Scharfen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00194
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00197
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00770
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00185
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Cheng Wen Zhu v. Michael Mukasey et al
as 2:2008cv08533
Respondent:
Lee Baca, Dennis Burns, Michael Chertoff and others
Petitioner:
Cheng Wen Zhu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Zaidi v. Chertoff et al
as 3:2009cv00144
Plaintiff:
Farah Zaidi
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Michael Aytes, Paul Pierre and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Garcia v. Holder, et al
as 2:2009cv00096
Petitioner:
Nicanor Mejia Garcia and Nicanor Mejia Garcia
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey and Neil Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
