Cases 1 - 10 of 10
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OWENS v. MERSHON et al
as 1:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL OWENS
Defendant:
JOHN MERSHON, DAUSS, DENNIS REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OWENS v. REAGLE
as 1:2021cv02317
Petitioner:
JEROME MICHAEL OWENS
Respondent:
DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
OWENS v. ZATECKY et al
as 1:2021cv01111
Defendant:
SHANNON SHOTT, DUSHAN ZATECKY, CHAD EVANS and others
Plaintiff:
JEROME MICHAEL OWENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWENS v. CARTER et al
as 2:2017cv00462
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, HILL, FRANK LITTLEJOHN and others
Plaintiff:
JEROME MICHAEL OWENS
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OPIPARI v. CITY OF PRINCETON et al
as 3:2016cv00235
Defendant:
CITY OF PRINCETON, CORRECTION OFFICERS NOT YET IDENTIFIED, JOHN DYER and others
Plaintiff:
DAWN OPIPARI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OPIPARI v. CITY OF PRINCETON et al
as 1:2016cv03189
Defendant:
CITY OF PRINCETON, CORRECTION OFFICERS NOT YET IDENTIFIED, JOHN DYER and others
Plaintiff:
DAWN OPIPARI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LANG et al v. OWENS et al
as 4:2011cv00087
Plaintiff:
PAULA LANG and TIMOTHY LANG
Defendant:
MARLOW TRUCKING COMPANY, INC. and MICHAEL OWENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LANG et al v. OWENS et al
as 1:2011cv00931
Plaintiff:
PAULA LANG and TIMOTHY LANG
Defendant:
MARLOW TRUCKING COMPANY, INC. and MICHAEL OWENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
IN RE: CLE REQUIREMENTS
as 1:2008mc00093
Respondent:
BRENDAN EDWARD WALKER, ROBERT GREGORY FORBES, LEWIS GLENN BENHAM and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
