Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01230
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-10254
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv01050
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARRISH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv50035
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL PARRISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARRISH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv06633
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL PARRISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bridwell v. Newton County District Attorneys Office, et al
as 1:2018cv03370
Defendant: Newton County District Attorneys Office and Michael Parrish
Plaintiff: Patrick Bridwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dunn v. Parrish et al (INMATE 2) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00497
Plaintiff: Michael Dunn
Defendant: Michael Parrish and Chambers County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Gary Parrish
as 17-11523
Petitioner: In re: GARY MICHAEL PARRISH
Successive Habeas Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Parrish v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2016cv01676
Plaintiff: Gary Michael Parrish
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: Gary Parrish
as 16-13738
Petitioner: In re: GARY MICHAEL PARRISH
Successive Habeas Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?