Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Yi Shao v. John Roberts, Jr., et al
as 22-15857
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YI TAI SHAO, AKA Linda Yi Tai Shao
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, Jr., ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, STEPHEN G. BREYER and others
(PS) Shao v. Roberts, et al.
as 2:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Yi Tai Shao and Linda Shao
Defendant:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M. Kennedy, Stephen Breyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
v. SHAO et al
as 2:2022at00196
Defendant:
Yi Tai SHAO, John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Yi Tai Shao v. John Roberts, et al
as 21-5210
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yi Tai Shao
Defendant / Appellee:
John G. Roberts, Chief Justice, Anthony M. Kennedy, Associate Justice, Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice and others
Yi Tai Shao v. John Roberts, et al
as 19-5014
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Supreme Court, Rice Pichon, BJ Fadem and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yi Tai Shao, Esquire, Attorney and Yi Tai Shao
SHAO v. KENNEDY et al
as 1:2018cv01233
Plaintiff:
YI TAI SHAO
Defendant:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, CLARENCE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yi Shao v. McManis Faulkner, LLP, et al
as 14-17063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YI TAI SHAO, AKA Linda Yi Tai Shao
Defendant - Appellee:
MCMANIS FAULKNER, LLP, JAMES MCMANIS, CATHERINE BECHTEL and others
Shao v. McManis Faulkner, LLP et al
as 5:2014cv01137
Plaintiff:
Yi Tai Shao
Defendant:
McManis Faulkner, LLP, James McManis, Catherine Bechtel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Reedy v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00981
Plaintiff:
Michael Reedy
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00588
Amicu:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
