Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Gorbey v. Warden
as 1:2014cv00178
Petitioner:
Michael S. Gorbey
Respondent:
FCI Gilmer Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gorbey v. Warden FCI Gilmer et al
as 2:2014cv00080
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gorbey
Defendant:
Warden FCI Gilmer, Captain FCI Gilmer, Unknown named SIS Officer FCI Gilmer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Gorbey v. State of West Virginia
as 14-6994
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA and D.C. JAIL WARDEN
Michael Gorbey v. Harold Clarke
as 14-6611
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Michael Gorbey v. Harold Clarke
as 14-6123
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Gorbey v. State of West Virginia et al
as 3:2013cv00169
Petitioner:
Michael S. Gorbey
Respondent:
State of West Virginia and D.C. Jail Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Gorbey v. Harold Clarke
as 13-6973
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Gorbey v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al - DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE. FILE IN CASE 2:12cv667
as 2:2013cv00102
Petitioner:
Michael S. Gorbey
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia and Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gorbey v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 2:2012cv00667
Petitioner:
Michael S. Gorbey
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gorbey v. The Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, & Explosives et al
as 5:2011cv00126
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gorbey
Defendant:
The Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, & Explosives, Heather Young and The United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
