Cases 41 - 50 of 134
Michael Owl Feather-Gorbey v. Angela Dunbar
as 22-6472
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
ANGELA DUNBAR, WARDEN TIMOTHY S. STEWART, MS. STAR and others
Michael Gorbey v. USA
as 22-5075
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael S. Gorbey
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Owl Feather-Gorbey v. NLN et al
as 3:2020cv01311
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey and Michael S Gorbey
Defendant:
US Attorney General and NFN NLN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gorbey v. Muberik et al
as 1:2019cv00220
Defendant:
Muberik, Vanmeter, Elrich and others
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gorbey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Gorbey v. Dunbar et al
as 1:2018cv02754
Defendant:
Angela Dunbar, Mr. Sample, Mr. Mubarak and others
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gorbey and Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Gorbey v. Commonwealth of VA
as 2:2018cv00110
Petitioner:
Michael S. Gorbey
Respondent:
Commonwealth of V.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Gorbey v. Warden
as 18-6051
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, USP Lee
Michael Gorbey v. Harold Clarke
as 17-6608
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Michael Gorbey v. Jackson Kiser
as 17-6605
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
Defendant - Appellee:
JACKSON L. KISER, Judge U.S. Dist. Ct., UNKNOWN NAMED PROSECUTER, Western Dist. of Virginia, PAMELA MEADE SARGENT, Magistrate Judge U.S. Dist. Ct and others
Michael Gorbey v. J. Bowle
as 17-6534
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. J. BOWLES, UNKNOWN NAMED SHU STAFF, LT. OFFICER AVERY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
