Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Chennette et al v. Porch.com et al
as 2:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
Nathan Chennette, Larry Akins, Gary Alger and others
Defendant:
Porch.com, GoSmith Inc, Matthew Ehrlichman and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rogers et al v. Department of Children Youth and Families et al
as 3:2021cv05248
Defendant:
Marybeth Queral, Department of Children, Youth and Families, Jody Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Joe Rogers, III, Ronald Ackerson, Damien Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2017cv00255
Plaintiff:
Chris Michael Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith v. BAC Home Loans Servicing LP
as 3:2015cv05028
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Zipcar, Inc., et al
as 2:2013cv00635
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
Zipcar, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Country Preferred Insurance Company v. Smith et al
as 2:2011cv01779
Plaintiff:
Country Preferred Insurance Company
Defendant:
Dane Michael Smith, Heather Arnold and Kimberly Bjorklund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Shaw et al v. Asotin County et al
as 2:2007cv00375
Plaintiff:
Jay Shaw, Jay Shaw, Estate of Tyler M Shaw and others
Defendant:
Asotin County, Asotin County Sheriff's Office, Wayne Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Penwell v. DeNeui et al
as 2:2007cv00027
Plaintiff:
Tony D Penwell
Defendant:
Bob DeNeui, Bob DeNeui, Bob O'Farrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
