Cases 1 - 10 of 10
ELLIOTT et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01741
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ELLIOTT, ANTWAIN JONES, ANTHONY STEWART and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, MAGGIE BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DIXON v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 2:2022cv00557
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DIXON
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, MICHAEL J. LEWIS, VIGO COUNTY, INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOLLIDAY v. LEWIS et al
as 2:2022cv00398
Plaintiff:
TERRYON GOLLIDAY
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. LEWIS, DOUGLAS G. CARTER, ROBERT ROBERTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01119
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WRIGHT
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Young et al
as 3:2018cv00614
Plaintiff:
James Michael Wright
Defendant:
Dustin Young and Uhles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Runyan et al
as 3:2018cv00579
Defendant:
"John Doe 1", Vicki Becker, A Montandon and others
Plaintiff:
James Michael Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. WRIGHT et al
as 2:2016cv00184
Defendant:
MICHAEL LEWIS and MICHAEL WRIGHT
Plaintiff:
RYAN DAMONE MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Wright
as 1:2014cv05387
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Schild v. Linaweaver et al
as 1:2013cv00245
Petitioner:
Scott Alan Schild
Respondent:
Warden Linaweaver , Michael Wright , Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Maynor v. Fearday et al
as 1:2012cv05316
Plaintiff:
Gregory S Maynor
Defendant:
Gregg Fearday, Bonnie M Nowakowski, Hattie P Sims and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
