Cases 71 - 80 of 1,655
Edwards v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv12158
Plaintiff:
Jashaan Edwards
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Saginaw Correctional Facility, Unknown and others
Haner #508463 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv01001
Plaintiff:
Cody Christopher Haner #508463
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, Jeremy Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas #295486 v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 1:2023cv00867
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Thomas #295486
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe et al v. Nessel et al
as 1:2023cv11655
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Tim Brown
Defendant:
Dana Nessel, Anica Letica, One Court of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MacLachlan #844474 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00806
Plaintiff:
Andrew MacLachlan #844474
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Nikki Monroe, Robert Crompton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1731
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dixon v. Chapman
as 5:2023cv11474
Petitioner:
Samuel Maurice Dixon, Jr.
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections and Willis Chapman
Peterson v. Young et al
as 2:2023cv11493
Plaintiff:
Toran Peterson
Defendant:
Madeline Young, Ronald W. Chapman, Jeffrey L. Bomber and others
Barnett #642005 v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 1:2023cv00760
Plaintiff:
Jared Rudolph Barnett #642005
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Interested Party:
Connie Broussea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leavitt v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 1:2023cv00577
Plaintiff:
Patrick Leavitt
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
