Cases 81 - 90 of 1,655
Spoors v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv11531
Plaintiff:
LaTanya V. Spoors
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi E Washington, Grand Praire Healthcare Services and others
Bonham v. Laurain et al
as 2:2023cv11594
Plaintiff:
Kevin Emanuel Bonham
Defendant:
Laurain, Michigan Department of Corrections and Corizon Health Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estes v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv11470
Plaintiff:
Larry Wendell Estes
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections and Heidi Washington
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wade #434839 v. Braman, et al
as 1:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
Dione Andre Wade #434839
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Kristie Marie Van Harn and Melinda Braman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bishop Perry v. MDOC, et al
as 23-1446
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BISHOP R. PERRY, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HAGGAGI
Mark White v. MDOC, et al
as 23-1637
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK EARL WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, DENTIST SMITH and others
Killian v. King et al
as 2:2023cv11577
Plaintiff:
Travor Austin Killian and Trevor Austin Killian
Defendant:
Mat King, St. Clair County Sheriff's Department, Port Huron Police Department and others
Simpson v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 1:2023cv00504
Plaintiff:
Paul Simpson
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Jones #637399 v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv00551
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jones #637399
Defendant:
C. Smith, J. Basye, Unknown Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
