Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Motley et al v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00176
Plaintiff:
Mickey Motley, Brandon Bragg and Ryan Huffman
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Virginia Department of Corrections and Chaplain Wagner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robson et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02751
Plaintiff:
Alan Robson , Andrew Tressler , Joseph Bennett and others
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc. , Lumber Liquidators Services, LLC and Lumber Liquidators Leasing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Murray v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2015cv00045
Plaintiff:
Mickey Murray
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Fields v. Accousti
as 2:2014cv00567
Plaintiff:
Mickey Fields
Defendant:
Dr. Kenneth J. Accousti, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. Rappahannock Regional Jail
as 2:2014cv00513
Plaintiff:
Mickey Fields
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schwabe v. Mickey et al
as 3:2013cv00369
Plaintiff:
Steven Schwabe
Defendant:
William Mickey and Carolyn Mickey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Andrews v. Honeywell International, Inc.
as 7:2011cv00052
Plaintiff:
Floyd Mickey Andrews
Defendant:
Honeywell International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Merkey v. Bedford County School Board et al
as 6:2010cv00020
Defendant:
Bedford County School Board, Julie M. Bennington, David S. Black and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Michael Merkey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barton v. Sass
as 1:2008cv00034
Plaintiff:
Mickey Barton, Mickey Barton and Mickey Barton
Defendant:
Robert Joseph Sass
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Edwards v. Debord et al
as 2:2008cv00150
Plaintiff:
Joe Cephus Edwards
Defendant:
Michelle Debord, Mickey Rodby and Doctor Beacnh
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
