Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Microchip Technology Inc. et al v. GTMI, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv06400
Plaintiff:
Microchip Technology Inc. and Microsemi Corp.
Defendant:
GTMI, INC., Cang Nguyen and Jerry Chang
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Microchip Technology, Inc. v. Aptiv Services US, LLC
as 1:2023cv00778
Plaintiff:
Microchip Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
Aptiv Technologies Limited
Counter Claimant:
Aptiv Services US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Infringement
HD Silicon Solutions LLC v. Microchip Technology, Inc.
as 23-1943
Appellant:
HD SILICON SOLUTIONS LLC
Appellee:
MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Aptiv Technologies Limited v. Microchip Technology, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00307
Counter Defendant:
Aptiv Technologies Limited and Aptiv Services US, LLC
Defendant:
Microchip Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Infringement
Winterspring Digital LLC v. Microchip Technology Inc.
as 2:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Winterspring Digital LLC
Defendant:
Microchip Technology Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
HD Silicon Solutions LLC v. Microchip Technology, Inc.
as 23-1397
Appellant:
HD SILICON SOLUTIONS LLC
Appellee:
MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv04352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Caddo Systems, Inc. v. Microchip Technology, Inc.
as 22-2043
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CADDO SYSTEMS, INC. and 511 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Microchip Technology Inc. v. Cortus S.A.S
as 2:2022cv01047
Petitioner:
Microchip Technology Inc.
Respondent:
Cortus S.A.S
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
